Legal Opinion
Rich v. Touche Ross & Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 15, 1976No. 74 Civ. 772-CLBPublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BRIEANT, District Judge.
Plaintiffs’ second amended complaint, filed June 11, 1975, premises this Court’s' subject matter jurisdiction upon § 27 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 [“the 1934 Act”], 15 U.S.C. § 78aa, and principles of pendent'jurisdiction. This complaint pleads two claims of fraud based upon §§ 10(b) and 18 of the 1934 Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 78j(b) and 78r, and related rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission [“SEC”], and a third claim charging common law negligence or accountant’s malpractice. The Court has previously dismissed plaintiffs’ amended…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Annette Heyman v. Commerce and Industry Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Superintendent of Insurance of New York v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Gross v. Diversified Mortgage InvestorsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- Jacobson v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,346 Robert L. Alley, Cross-Appellee v. Louis Miramon, Jr., Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Oppenheim, Appel, Dixon & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.