Kralik v. LeClair
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.
Verdicts under leave reserved were entered for each defendant and the cases were reported by the trial judge to this court, with a stipulation as to entry of judg*324merits for the plaintiffs in the amounts awarded by the jury, if there was error, otherwise that judgment was to be entered for the defendant in each case. The judge ruled, without objection, that the defendant corporation was engaged in the transportation of property in interstate commerce, and it was agreed that, on the morning of the accident, the defendant LeClair was “its employee engaged to operate the said motor vehicle.”
The…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Falk v. FinkelmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Wallace v. LudwigMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Baggs v. HirschfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Chase v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Milbury v. Turner Centre SystemMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Carter v. Yardley & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- LaClair v. Silberline Manufacturing Co., Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Bernier v. Boston Edison Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Sullivan v. GriffinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
- Permenter v. Milner Chevrolet Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1956
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.