Legal Opinion

Clarke v. Bohemian Breweries, Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1941No. 28112PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

James Clarke, the plaintiff in this action, was an experienced automobile body and fender repairman. He had also worked in and around a service station, and had also for some time operated a garage of his own. During the month of March, 1939, plaintiff and one Clarence Glass formed a partnership for the purpose of engaging in the business of repairing and painting automobile bodies and fenders. Mr. Glass had had considerable experience in working with automobiles, most of his time, however, having been devoted to painting them.

Defendant, Bohemian Breweries, Inc., has for a long time been…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Billing v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Macale v. LynchWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Walter v. Everett School District No. 24Washington Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Central R. Co. of New Jersey v. De BusleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Davis v. Early Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Nissula v. Southern Idaho Timber Protective Ass'nIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Sgro v. Getty Petroleum Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1994
  4. Pichler v. Pacific Mechanical ConstructorsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1969
  5. Erickson Paving Co. v. Yardley Drilling Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API