Legal Opinion
Lockwood Motors, Inc. v. General Motors Corp.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided June 23, 1995No. Civ. No. 3-94-1141PublishedCited by 81 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KYLE, District Judge.
Introduction
Plaintiff Lockwood Motors, Inc. (“Lockwood”) commenced this unfair business action against General Motors Corporation (“GM”) on behalf of all GM new automobile dealers in the State of Minnesota. Lockwood claims that it and similarly situated GM dealers have been and continue to be required to contribute to a GM advertising fund in violation of the Federal Automobile Dealers’ Day in Court Act (“ADDCA”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1221-1225, and the Minnesota Motor Vehicle Sale and Distribution Act (“MMVSDA”), Minnesota Statutes section 80E.12.…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Fletcher Casey, Jr., on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Samuel A. Lewis, Director, Arizona Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Mary Jane Forbush v. J.C. Penney Company, Inc., Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Baughman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Cope v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Nerland v. Caribou Coffee Co., Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2007
- In re Consol. Mtge. Satisfaction CasesOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Force v. ITT Hartford Life & Annuity InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.