Legal Opinion
Force v. ITT Hartford Life & Annuity Insurance
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided June 10, 1999No. Nos. 97-MD-1204, 97-1619/RHK/JMMPublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KYLE, District Judge.
Introduction
This case is part of a multidistrict litigation challenging several of the sales practices of Defendants ITT Hartford Life and Annuity Insurance Company (“IHLA”) and Hartford Life Insurance Company (“HLIC”) (collectively, “ITT Hartford” or the “Defendants”). The Plaintiffs brought a multitude of claims against ITT Hartford based on three separate alleged sales schemes: “the vanishing premium scheme,” “the churning sales scheme,” and “the retirement/investment plans scheme.” On December 16, 1997, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Kaldenbach v. Mutual of Omaha Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Fisher v. Ciba Specialty Chemicals Corp.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2006
- Flores v. Anjost Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Vos v. Farm Bureau Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2003
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.