Legal Opinion

Hermanson v. Hermanson

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 30, 2003No. G030281PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ARONSON, J.

Jenny, Josh, and Robert Hermanson, beneficiaries of the Esther R. Hermanson Trust (the trust), challenge an order declaring the trust’s “no contest” clause would be violated by their proposed petition to remove the trustees for malfeasance. They concede their petition runs afoul of the trust’s no contest clause, but argue enforcement of that provision is barred by section 21305, subdivision (b)(6) and (7). We disagree.

Per section 21305, subdivision (b)(6) and (7), a petition challenging the exercise of fiduciary power and requesting the removal of a fiduciary does not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Colmenares v. Braemar Country Club, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Graham v. LenziCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. Plumleigh v. FerberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. Belfiore v. HoffmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Tunstall v. WellsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  2. Bradley v. GilbertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. Fazzi v. KleinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. Cory v. ToscanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. Zwirn v. SchweizerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API