Hermanson v. Hermanson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ARONSON, J.
Jenny, Josh, and Robert Hermanson, beneficiaries of the Esther R. Hermanson Trust (the trust), challenge an order declaring the trust’s “no contest” clause would be violated by their proposed petition to remove the trustees for malfeasance. They concede their petition runs afoul of the trust’s no contest clause, but argue enforcement of that provision is barred by section 21305, subdivision (b)(6) and (7). We disagree.
Per section 21305, subdivision (b)(6) and (7), a petition challenging the exercise of fiduciary power and requesting the removal of a fiduciary does not…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Colmenares v. Braemar Country Club, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2003
- Graham v. LenziCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Plumleigh v. FerberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Belfiore v. HoffmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
3Cited by9 opinions
- Tunstall v. WellsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Bradley v. GilbertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Fazzi v. KleinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Cory v. ToscanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Zwirn v. SchweizerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.