Legal Opinion

Belfiore v. Hoffman

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 30, 2002No. B146383PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KLEIN, P. J.

Myra H. Belfiore (Myra) and Danette H. Magilligan (Danette) (collectively appellants) appeal an order which determined their proposed petition to remove the executors of the estate of Kathleen T. Hoffman would be a contest within the meaning of the no contest clause in the decedent’s will. (Prob. Code, § 21320.) 1 , 2

The essential issue presented is whether the proposed petition would constitute á contest under the will.

Section 21305, subdivision (b)(7), proclaims that as a matter of public policy, a petition seeking the removal of a fiduciary does not violate a no contest…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Evangelatos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Burch v. GeorgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. McDowell v. WatsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  4. International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union v. Los Angeles Export Terminal, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. Scharlin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Conte v. Wyeth, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. Hermanson v. HermansonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  3. Bradley v. GilbertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. Cory v. ToscanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. Zwirn v. SchweizerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API