Legal Opinion

New Jersey Bell Telephone Co. v. State Board of Taxes & Assessments

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 24, 1930No. 254PublishedCited by 89 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Butler

In 1928 appellee made an assessment against the appellant under a law of New Jersey known as the Voorhees Franchise Tax Act. Appellant caused the assessment by writ of certiorari to be brought to the supreme court of the State and there insisted that as construed the statute is repugnant to the Commerce Clause. That court held the law valid, sustained the tax and dismissed the writ. 105 N. J. L. 94. And its judgment was affirmed in the court of errors and appeals. 105 N. J. L. 641.

As stated in its title, the Act is one “ for the taxation of all the property and franchises of persons,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Philadelphia & Southern Steamship Co. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Sprout v. South BendSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  4. United States Glue Co. v. Town of Oak CreekSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  5. St. Louis v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by89 opinions

  1. James v. Dravo Contracting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Jefferson Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Nippert v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. J. D. Adams Manufacturing Co. v. StorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Minnesota v. BlasiusSupreme Court of the United States · 1933

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API