Legal Opinion

Griffith v. Gohlman, Lester & Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 12, 1923No. 248PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Quinn, J.

We shall refer to defendants in error as plaintiffs and to plaintiff in error as defendant, that being their attitude in the court below.

Plaintiffs sued 'defendant in the district court of Harris county, and alleged that they resided in Harris county, and that defendant resided in Wilson county. For cause of action plaintiffs alleged that on September 4, 1913, and ever since said date, they were en gaged in the business of cotton commission merchants at Houston, Texas, receiving, handling, caring for, and selling cotton for a commission, and that in the course of said business they were…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Schulz v. Frank Tessman & Bro.Texas Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Gohlman v. GriffithTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  3. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  4. Anderson v. GammonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Carnes v. KayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  2. Buckner Orphans Home v. MabenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  3. Temple Lumber Co. v. PulliamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  4. DAVIS BUMPER TO BUMPER, INCORPORATED v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  5. Defferari v. TerryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API