Schulz v. Frank Tessman & Bro.
Texas Supreme Court
Ebeoe to the Court of Civil Appeals for the Fourth District, in an appeal from Bexar County. Tessman & Bro. sued Schulz and had judgment for $1000, from which the latter appealed and on affirmance obtained writ of error.
1Opinion of the Court
GAINES, Chief Justice.
This suit was brought by the defendants in error against the plaintiff in error to recover damages for the breach of a contract. The agreement ivas in writing, and by it the plaintiff in error, Schulz, in consideration of the defendants in error, Tessman & Bro., “boring a well on the premises of the said Arthur Schulz, at such a place as may be designated by him, and said well so bored by the said party of the second part shall furnish at least seventy-five barrels of water per day, to be estimated by a full test and trial; said water, if possible, to be good water for…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Baker v. SmelserTexas Supreme Court · 1895
- Heidenheimer & Co. v. L. A. & EllisTexas Supreme Court · 1887
- Island City Savings Bank v. SachtlebenTexas Supreme Court · 1887
3Cited by69 opinions
- Bybee v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1960
- Pecos & Northern Texas Railway Co. v. RayzorTexas Supreme Court · 1915
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. ArnoldTexas Supreme Court · 1904
- Gulf, West Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. FrommeTexas Supreme Court · 1905
- Cotherman v. Oriental Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1925
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.