Legal Opinion

Gohlman v. Griffith

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided November 29, 1922No. 360-3171PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGallagher, J.

Gohlman, Lester & Co., plaintiffs in error, were plaintiffs and John Griffith, defendant in error, was defendant in the trial court, and they will be so designated here.

Plaintiffs sued defendant in the district court of Harris county and alleged that they resided in Harris' county, and that the defendant resided in Wilson county.

They further alleged that they were, on September 4, 1913, and had been ever since said date, engaged at Houston, Tex., as cotton commission merchants, receiving, handling, caring for, and selling cotton for a commission, and in the course of said business had been…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Robb v. San Antonio Street Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Boothe v. FiestTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Lasater v. WaitsTexas Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Austin v. William Cameron & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Simpson v. . Jersey City Contracting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. World Company v. DowTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Benson v. Greenville Nat. Exchange BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  3. Farmer v. CassityCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  4. Griffith v. Gohlman, Lester & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  5. Benson v. Greenville Nat. Exchange BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API