Legal Opinion

Fallo v. High-Tech Institute

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 24, 2009No. 08-2437PublishedCited by 130 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRUENDER, Circuit Judge.

Thirty-eight current and former students filed suit against High-Tech Institute (“High-Tech”). High-Tech moved to compel arbitration, arguing that an arbitrator should determine whether the students’ tort claims were within the scope of the arbitration provision in the students’ enrollment agreements. The district court held that it had the authority to determine the question of arbitrability, that the arbitration provision did not cover the students’ tort claims, and that High-Tech’s motion to compel arbitration should be denied. High-Tech appeals, and for the reasons…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Preston v. FerrerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. CONTEC CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee, v. REMOTE SOLUTION CO., LTD., Defendant-Counterclaimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by130 opinions

  1. Carey Brennan v. Opus BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  2. Oracle America, Inc. v. Myriad Group A.G.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  3. Petrofac, Inc. v. DynMcDermott Petroleum Operations Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
  4. Jody James Farms, Jv v. the Altman Group, Inc. and Laurie DiazTexas Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Belnap v. Iasis HealthcareCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017

125 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API