Legal Opinion

Widder Dye & Chemical Co. v. United States Marking Tag Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 15, 1934PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order dismissing the complaint reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs, with leave to answer within ten days from the entry of the order herein, on the ground that the complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. There is sufficient allegation of consideration in the complaint, and evidence to support this allegation will be admissible although the agreement itself may not show mutual promises or undertakings. (Hocking Valley Railway Co. v. Barbour, 190 App. Div. 341.) The agreement is not necessarily…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Oregon Steam Navigation Co. v. WinsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Edgecomb v. EdmonstonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  3. Hocking Valley Railway Co. v. BarbourAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
  4. Ru Ton v. EverittAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  5. Aero-Bocker Corp. v. AxelrodNew York Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Israel Goldstein v. MaiselAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API