Legal Opinion

Israel Goldstein v. Maisel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 3, 1947Published

1Opinion of the Court

Defendant sold to plaintiff Goldstein his one-half interest in a partnership business, theretofore conducted in the borough of Queens by him and Goldstein. Defendant covenanted not to engage in a similar line of business either as owner or as employee for twenty years. There was no territory named in which the restriction was to operate. Thereafter the defendant engaged in a similar business, either as owner or employee, in the borough of *972Brooklyn. In this action to restrain the defendant from violating his restrictive covenant, judgment was rendered for plaintiffs only to the, extent of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Clark Paper & Manufacturing Co. v. StenacherNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Edgecomb v. EdmonstonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  3. Interstate Tea Co. v. Alt.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
  4. Hill v. Central West Public Service Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1930
  5. Prame v. FerrellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API