Legal Opinion

Opinion No. Oag 28-84, (1984)

Wisconsin Attorney General Reports

Decided August 22, 1984PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN HOGAN, District Attorney Oneida County

You ask whether a tri-county combined 51.42/51.437 board may make cuts in non-emergency services to the residents of a county that does not provide its proportionate share of funding to that board. You state that sufficient funds are available to provide emergency services to persons in all three counties. Apparently, however, the board lacks sufficient funds to continue providing the present level of services through the rest of 1984.

I am of the opinion that a multi-county combined board may make such cuts in services, but that an individual county…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Opinion No. Oag 71-77, (1977), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1977
  2. Opinion No. Oag 22-76, (1976), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1976
  3. Opinion No. Oag 32-80, (1980), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1980

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Opinion No. Oag 44-85, (1985), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API