Legal Opinion

Robidoux v. Kitchel

District Court, D. Vermont

Decided February 13, 1995No. 2:91-cr-00114PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

BILLINGS, Senior District Judge.

This is a class action initiated pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 1 on behalf of all persons who have, since the date of commencement of this action, applied for, or may in the future apply for, assistance from the Vermont Department of Social Welfare (“DSW”) under either the Food Stamp or Ad to Families with Needy Children (“ANFC”) programs. 2 Defendants are Jane Kitehel and Veronica Celani, the current and former Commissioners of the DSW, respectively. Plaintiffs assert that the DSW’s failure to process applications for Food Stamps and/or ANFC…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Henrietta D. v. GiulianiDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2000
  2. Yazzie v. Ray Vicker's Special Cars, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 1998
  3. Garnett v. ZeilingerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  4. Booth v. McManamanDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2011
  5. Albert v. Ohio Department of Human ServicesOhio Court of Appeals · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API