Legal Opinion
Garnett v. Zeilinger
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided May 31, 2018No. Case No. 17–cv–1757 (CRC)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHRISTOPHER R. COOPER, United States District Judge
States that participate in the federal Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program ("SNAP") must comply with strict statutory deadlines for processing benefit applications and periodically recertifying benefit eligibility. Plaintiffs, three classes of District of Columbia residents, have sued the director of the agency that administers the District's SNAP program for alleged noncompliance with these deadlines and now move for a preliminary injunction. The injunction sought would compel the District to: (1) adhere to the statutory timelines for…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Weinberger v. Romero-BarceloSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Chaplaincy of Full Gospel Churches v. EnglandCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Sherley v. SebeliusCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Garnett v. ZeilingerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Boynes v. Limetree Bay Ventures, LLCDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2023
- GILLIAM v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTUREDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- Garnett v. ZeilingerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- John Andrew, et al. v. Heidi Hedberg, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the Alaska Department of HealthDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.