Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Shasta County
District Court, E.D. California
Decided January 6, 2015No. 2:14-cv-01338-KJM-EFBPublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*923ORDER
KIMBERLY J. MUELLER, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the motion by defendants Sutter County, Matthew Maples, James Casner, and Michael Gwinnup (Sutter defendants) to dismiss plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (Defs.’ Mot. to Dismiss, ECF No. 6.) Plaintiffs oppose the motion (Pis.’ Opp’n, ECF No. 9), and the Sutter defendants have replied (ECF No. 10). In support of their opposition plaintiffs filed a request for judicial notice, including a declaration and exhibits. (ECF Nos. 9-1 through 9-7.) The Sutter defendants object…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Cornell v. City & Cnty. of S.F., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Garlick v. County of KernDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2016
- Victoria v. City of San DiegoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2018
- (PS) White v. City and County of West SacramentoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- Adams v. City of ReddingDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.