Legal Opinion

Adams v. City of Redding

District Court, E.D. California

Decided November 16, 2022No. 2:20-cv-01610Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CINDY ADAMS, individually and as No. 2:20-cv-01610-TLN-DMC Personal Representative to the Estate of 12 JESSE ADAMS, 13 Plaintiff, ORDER 14 v. 15 CITY OF REDDING; KYLE CORRIGAN, CHRISTOPHER STAUP, EDWARD 16 MCGINNIS, and DOES 4 through 10, 17 Defendants. 18 19 This matter is before the Court on Defendant City of Redding’s (“Defendant”) Motion to 20 Dismiss.1 (ECF No. 30.) Plaintiff Cindy Adams (“Plaintiff”) filed an opposition (ECF No. 31), 21 and Defendant replied (ECF No. 33). For the reasons set forth below,…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API