Legal Opinion

Horwath v. Edward G. Budd Mfg. Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 9, 1937No. Appeal, 34PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.

The underlying facts in this workmen’s compensation case are not in dispute; the controversy relates to the inferences deducible from them.

Claimant, apparently a healthy man forty-nine years of age, while in the course of his employment as a machinist with the Edward G. Budd Manufacturing Company, on August 23, 1935, suffered an accidental injury to his left foot when a heavy mallet fell upon it.

The injury is described in the testimony as a “fracture of the distal head of the second and third metatarsal bones.”

An open agreement for payment of compensation for total…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Graham v. Hillman Coal & Coke Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Kessler v. North Side Packing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Swingle v. Mill Creek Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tomshuck v. Wallin Concrete Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. Zygmunt v. Copperweld Steel Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Barbaryka v. Henderson Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API