Legal Opinion

Barbaryka v. Henderson Coal Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 28, 1943No. Appeals, 68 and 69PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, P. J.,

This appeal is chiefly concerned with the sufficiency of the evidence to support certain findings of fact of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, namely: (1) That claimant sustained an accident in the course of his employment resulting in a compensable injury. (2) That the claimant’s present total disability is the result of that accident.

If these findings are upheld then the following related questions arise:(3) Does the record show that due notice of the accident was given the employer?(4) What amount of compensation is the claimant entitled to?

This last question may be…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Rich Hill Coal Company v. BashoreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Nesbit v. Vandervort & CurrySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Petrulo v. M. O'Herron Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. McGee v. Y. O. Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Dazely v. Luckenbach Steamship Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pepsi Cola Metro Bottling Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Mattey v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API