Legal Opinion

Royster v. English

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 26, 1959No. 18662PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Frantz

The motion to dismiss writ of error, filed by English, on the ground that the controversy presented to this court has become, and is now, moot, should be granted. As ground for this motion English alleges — and supports it by a narration of events, record of proceedings, and an affidavit — 'that Royster and English have compromised and settled their differences.

All the matters set forth in support of the motion, excepting the negotiations for settlement, agreement of compromise and settlement, and the understanding of the parties at the time the money was paid to English, are admitted by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dakota County v. GliddenSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Reserve Life Ins. Co., Dallas, Tex. v. FrankfatherSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950
  3. Floyd v. CochranSupreme Court of Colorado · 1898
  4. Hunter v. DickinsonColorado Court of Appeals · 1893

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Greenough v. Prairie Dog Ranch, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Wilson v. AUTOMOBILE OWNERS ASSOCIATION INS. CO.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1963
  3. S.L.K. Associates v. Charolay Apartments, Ltd.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API