Legal Opinion

Hunter v. Dickinson

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided April 15, 1893PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Arapahoe County.

1Opinion of the CourtBissell, P. J.

In 1892, Hayden, Dickinson and Feldhauser were the owners of a piece of realty situate on the corner of California and Sixteenth streets in the city of Denver. They were erecting a large business block on the property, and their plans contemplated that the water connections should be made on Sixteenth street, on a line which should be substantially that of the alley north of their building extended through Sixteenth street. At that time Sixteenth street had been paved with asphalt — while California remained uncovered with a pavement. There were two lines of water mains running along each…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Reserve Life Ins. Co., Dallas, Tex. v. FrankfatherSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950
  2. Burns v. National Mining, Tunnel & Land Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. Royster v. EnglishSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  4. Woodmen Investment Ass'n v. Grand JunctionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
  5. Burns v. National Mining, Tunnel & Land Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API