Legal Opinion

Floyd v. Cochran

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1898No. 3652PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error to Court of Appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Goddard

This case involves the validity of one of the deeds through which Floyd, the plaintiff in error, claimed title to the Empress lode mining claim, which was issued in pursuance of a sale of the property under the Margaret Sargent judgment referred to in Sellers v. Floyd, ante, p. 484, and presents the question of the right of Cochran to redeem the property from that sale. In that case we determined the rights of the parties to the property, and held that the title thereto had become vested in Floyd through and by virtue of certain other execution sales. The question involved in this case,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mills v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Reserve Life Ins. Co., Dallas, Tex. v. FrankfatherSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950
  2. Metropolitan Development & Housing Agency v. HillCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1974
  3. Knowles v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1909
  4. Bull v. Doss Bros. Electric Construction Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1911
  5. Hawthorne v. Hendrie & Bolthoff Manufacturing & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1911

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API