Legal Opinion

Besinek v. Lamone

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 18, 2018No. 17-333PublishedCited by 342 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

(Slip Opinion) Cite as:

585 U. S. ____

(2018) 1 Per Curiam NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Wash- ington, D. C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order that corrections may be made before the preliminary print goes to press. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________ No. 17–333 _________________ O. JOHN BENISEK, ET AL., APPELLANTS v. LINDA H. LAMONE, ADMINISTRATOR, MARYLAND STATE…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Purcell v. GonzalezSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Fishman v. SchafferSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by342 opinions

  1. D.T. v. Sumner Cty. Sch.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  2. Geft Outdoors, LLC v. City of WestfieldCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  3. Tod Tumey v. Mycroft AI, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022
  4. Michael Rodgers v. Bill BryantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
  5. Resurrection Sch. v. Elizabeth HertelCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022

337 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API