Legal Opinion

Knisley v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided July 3, 2002No. 05-01-00326-CRPublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice RICHTER.

Appellant appeals his conviction for driving while intoxicated. In two points of error, appellant complains the trial court erroneously denied his motion to suppress the blood alcohol results obtained from a blood specimen. Appellant argues that a person must be under arrest before section 724.014(a) of the Texas Transportation Code permits the lawful taking of a blood specimen from a person who is dead, unconscious, or otherwise incapable of refusal. Additionally, appellant contends the State lacked probable cause to arrest him. The State argues that the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  3. State v. RossCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  4. Romero v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  5. Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Garcia v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
  2. State v. Mosely, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2011
  3. State v. Cullen, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2007
  4. State v. May, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2007
  5. Washburn v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2007

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API