Russell Petroleum Co. v. Walker
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1DissentOsborn, J.
In dissenting-in part from the majority opinion of the court, I deem it proper at least briefly to state my views. 1 shall not attempt to elaborate upon tbe compelling principles which require my dissent.
First. I desire to concur in that part of the majority opinion holding that the district court is without jurisdiction to review, reverse, correct, or annul the orders ot‘ the Corporation Commission within the scope of its authority. Under the express provisions of section 20, art. 9, of the Constitution, exclusive jurisdiction is conferred upon this court,
Second. The plaintiff is not…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Kendall v. United States Ex Rel. StokesSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
- Champlin Rfg. Co. v. Corporation Commission of OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Sterling v. ConstantinSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Martin v. MottSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- Moyer v. PeabodySupreme Court of the United States · 1909
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.