Legal Opinion

Fitzpatrick v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided August 16, 2019No. 2:17-cv-01886Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 * * * 6 PATRICIA FITZPATRICK, et al., Case No. 2:17-cv-1886-JAD-BNW 7 Plaintiffs, ORDER 8 v. 9 LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., 10 Defendants. 11 12 13 Presently before the court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Rule-Compliant Responses to 14 Request for Production Nos. 3 and 4; to Compel Defendant’s Designation of FRCP 30(b)(6) 15 Designees; For an Adverse Inference Jury Instruction as a Sanction For Defendant’s Spoliation of 16 Evidence; and For Attorney’s Fees and Costs Pursuant to FRCP 37(a)(5) (ECF No. 103), 17…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Andrew H.K. Wong v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. Janicki Logging Co. v. Bruce Mateer Dale RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  3. Bull HN Information Systems Inc. v. HutsonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API