Legal Opinion

Mercantile Investment & Holding Co. v. Gilliland

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 1, 1941PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

The plaintiff recovered a $50,000.00 judgment against defendant for unpaid salary. Defendant took writ of error. (In the same action the plaintiff suffered an involuntary nonsuit on other counts of his declaration for breach of contract. See Gilliland v. Mercantile Investment & Holding Company, decided at this term.)

The theory of plaintiff’s case submitted to the jury was: first, special assumpsit wherein he claimed defendant named him for a ten-year period at an annual salary of $15,000.00 to act in various official capacities with Hollywood, Inc., a company holding valuable properties of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wright v. TerrySupreme Court of Florida · 1887
  2. East Coast Stores, Inc. v. Cuthbert Et Ux.Supreme Court of Florida · 1931

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kuharske v. Lake County Citrus SalesSupreme Court of Florida · 1949
  2. Mercantile Investment & Holding Co. v. GillilandSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
  3. State Ex Rel. Mercantile Investment & Holding Co. v. TedderSupreme Court of Florida · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API