Legal Opinion

East Coast Stores, Inc. v. Cuthbert Et Ux.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided April 1, 1931PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendants in error instituted distress proceedings in the Circuit Court of Dade County, for the collection of rent alleged to be due them. As a basis for issuing the distress warrant an affidavit was filed. This affidavit did not aver that the amount of rent claimed was due by the East Coast Stores Inc. and the Southern Stores Corporation, jointly. The language of the first paragraph of the affidavit indicates that the East Coast Stores Inc. owed the amount claimed; while the second paragraph avers that the Southern Stores Corporation "assumed the liability for and is now responsible for…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Benedict Pineapple Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
  2. Wright v. TerrySupreme Court of Florida · 1887
  3. Bowery v. BabbitSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  4. Hartford Fire Insurance v. HollisSupreme Court of Florida · 1909
  5. Moore v. LanierSupreme Court of Florida · 1906

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Commercial Union Ins. Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  2. International Erectors, Inc. v. Wilhoit Steel Erectors & Rental ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  3. Stasys Barzda and Mary Barzda v. Quality Courts Motel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  4. Holloman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
  5. Pine Grove Nevada Gold Mining Co. v. FreemanNevada Supreme Court · 1946

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API