Legal Opinion
Mercantile Investment & Holding Co. v. Gilliland
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided October 10, 1941PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.
This petition is submitted by defendant in error to review an order of the circuit court taxing costs pursuant to Rule 24 of this Court.
The item taxed as cost and here complained of is $600.00 representing the premium paid for a supersedeas bond. Chapter 16246 Gen. Laws, 1933, provide:
“Section 1. If costs shall be awarded to either or any party in any civil cause at common law or in equity in any court of the State of Florida, then the reasonable premiums or expenses paid on all bonds or stipulations, or other security furnished in the said cause by the prevailing party in whose favor such…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Mercantile Investment & Holding Co. v. GillilandSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
3Cited by3 opinions
- Spriggs Enterprises, Inc. v. Purcell Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1984
- Miami Retreat Foundation v. ErvinSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
- Melvin v. WestDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960