Legal Opinion

Omdahl v. West Iron County Board of Education

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 2007No. Docket 131926PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, C.J.

At issue in this case is whether a pro se litigant, who is also an attorney, may recover “court costs and actual attorney fees,” MCL 15.271(4), after he or she brings a successful action under the Open Meetings Act. We conclude that because an attorney is defined as an agent of another person, there must be separate identities between the attorney and the client before the litigant may recover actual attorney fees. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals that held to the contrary, and remand to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

I.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kay v. EhrlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. In Re MCI Telecommunications ComplaintMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Booth Newspapers, Inc v. University of Michigan Board of RegentsMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Lapeer County Clerk v. Lapeer Circuit JudgesMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  5. People v. YamatMichigan Supreme Court · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Petersen v. Magna Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Speicher v. Columbia Township Board of TrusteesMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Fraser Trebilcock Davis & Dunlap Pc v. Boyce Trust 2350Michigan Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Speicher v. Columbia Township Board of Election CommissionersMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Bode & Grenier, L.L.P. v. KnightDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API