Legal Opinion

Fraser Trebilcock Davis & Dunlap Pc v. Boyce Trust 2350

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 2015No. Docket 148931, 148932, and 148933PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCORMACK, J.

Before us is whether the plaintiff law firm can recover, as case-evaluation sanctions under MCR 2.403(O)(6)(b), a “reasonable attorney fee” for the legal services performed by its own member lawyers in connection with its suit to recover unpaid fees from the defendants, former clients of the firm. Contrary to the determinations of the trial court and the Court of Appeals majority, we conclude it cannot. Accordingly, we reverse the Court of Appeals in part, vacate the trial court’s award of a “reasonable attorney fee” to the plaintiff under MCR 2.403(O)(6)(b), and remand to the trial court for…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kay v. EhrlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Baker & Hostetler LLP v. United States Department of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
  3. Smith v. KhouriMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Buscaino v. RhodesMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  5. McAuley v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Altobelli v. HartmannMichigan Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Tennine Corp. v. Boardwalk Commercial, LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Rosenthal Law Firm, LLC v. CohenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
  4. Elizabeth a Silverman Pc v. Lawrence David KornMichigan Supreme Court · 2021
  5. In Re Contempt of Marlena Pavlos-HackneyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2022

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API