Legal Opinion

Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Converse

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 2004No. 03-1518-DPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

¶ 1. This case is before us pursuant to a stipulation between the parties, Attorney Mark E. Converse, and the Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR). The stipulation recited that Attorney Converse filed an answer to the OLR's complaint in which he admitted every allegation contained therein. The stipulation further provided that Attorney Converse was willing to stipulate to entry of an order by the referee making findings of fact and conclusions of law for all of the disciplinary violations alleged in the complaint. Only the appropriate level of discipline for the violations remained in dispute.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against ConverseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against ConverseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. ListerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  2. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against ConverseWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  3. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against ConverseWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API