Sivak v. United Parcel Service Co.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT IN ITS ENTIRETY OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
’ GERALD E. ROSEN, Chief Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs Steven B. Sivak and International Samaritan contend that United *704Parcel Service (UPS) intentionally overcharges customers who purchase additional liability coverage for packages with a declared value of over $300.00. Each overcharge may be less than $1.00, but these overcharges can quickly add up given UPS’s position as the world’s largest package delivery company. Under…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- 16630 Southfield Ltd. Partnership v. Flagstar Bank, F.S.B.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Joe Solo v. United Parcel Service Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Joe Solo v. United Parcel Service Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- (SS) Quiroz v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- Ladonna Lomeli and John Franklin Jr. v. United Parcel Service CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2026