Legal Opinion

Sivak v. United Parcel Service Co.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided July 1, 2014No. 13-cv-15263PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT IN ITS ENTIRETY OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS

’ GERALD E. ROSEN, Chief Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs Steven B. Sivak and International Samaritan contend that United *704Parcel Service (UPS) intentionally overcharges customers who purchase additional liability coverage for packages with a declared value of over $300.00. Each overcharge may be less than $1.00, but these overcharges can quickly add up given UPS’s position as the world’s largest package delivery company. Under…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. 16630 Southfield Ltd. Partnership v. Flagstar Bank, F.S.B.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Joe Solo v. United Parcel Service Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  2. Joe Solo v. United Parcel Service Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  3. (SS) Quiroz v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
  4. Ladonna Lomeli and John Franklin Jr. v. United Parcel Service CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API