Legal Opinion

Ladonna Lomeli and John Franklin Jr. v. United Parcel Service Company

District Court, S.D. California

Decided September 11, 2026No. 3:25-cv-00422Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LADONNA LOMELI and JOHN Case No.: 25cv422-LL-AHG FRANKLIN JR., 12 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO Plaintiffs, 13 COMPEL ARBITRATION AND v. STAYING ACTION [18] 14 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 15 ORDER DENYING EX PARTE COMPANY, a foreign corporation REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT 16 authorized to do business and doing [24] business in California, 17 Defendant. 18 19 Before the Court is Defendant United Parcel Service Company’s (“UPS”) Motion to 20 Compel Arbitration (“Motion”). Dkt. 18. Plaintiffs Ladonna Lomeli and John Franklin…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Meyer v. Uber Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
  4. Carey Brennan v. Opus BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  5. Kevin Nguyen v. Barnes & Noble Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API