Doemel v. Jantz
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDoerfler, J.
The only question involved in this appeal is whether a member of the public can legally enter upon and use for the purposes' of public travel that strip of land ■adjacent to plaintiff’s upland, and lying between the ordinary high and low-water marks, and constituting what is ordinarily known as the shore, without committing trespass. It appearing that the public interests may be involved in this litigation, the attorney general .was permitted to intervene and file a brief and participate in the argument before this court..
Plaintiff is a riparian owner of lands abutting on Lake Winnebago, and…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Illinois Central Railroad v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Yates v. MilwaukeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Barney v. KeokukSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Illinois Steel Co. v. BilotWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- Willow River Club v. WadeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Hilt v. WeberMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Zinn v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- W.H. Pugh Coal Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
- Wilbour v. GallagherWashington Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. McFarrenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.