State v. Pinder
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtKing, C.J.
The defendant, Bernard Richard Pinder, was convicted of possession of a controlled drug in violation of RSA 318-B:2, following a trial in superior court. The defendant appealed on the grounds that the trial court erred in denying the defendant’s motions to suppress items taken during a consent search of the defendant’s property and to suppress statements made by the defendant during and after the search. Because we conclude that the defendant consented only to a search of his house and did not authorize a search of outbuildings on his property, we hold that the trial judge erred in failing to…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert RACKLEY, Randall T. Crosby, Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- People v. RobbinsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. HightSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
- State v. SuttonNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. GreenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
- State v. OrdeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
- State v. SaundersSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.