State v. Radoff
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.
— Tbe appellant, having been found guilty of maintaining a joint, is entitled to a new trial, for the reason that evidence of the general reputation of the place of business conducted by him was improperly admitted.
From the testimony, it appears that the appellant himself was conducting business in the place which it is alleged was a joint, without the assistance of anyone, and that all possession of intoxicating liquor, sale or disposal of it, was had and made, if at all, by the appellant himself. The appellant admitted that he was the owner of the place, and in the actual conduct of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Tucker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1912
- State v. HensonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1901
- State v. . BurnettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
- State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
- State v. HerlihySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1906
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Pfotzer v. Aqua System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
- People v. DaibochNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- State v. BezemerWashington Supreme Court · 1932
- Haley v. BradyWashington Supreme Court · 1943
- State v. HillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.