Legal Opinion

State v. Henson

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 15, 1901PublishedCited by 41 opinions

On error to the Mercer Oyer and Terminer.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court' was delivered by

Van Syckel, J.

The defendant, on his trial for homicide, was sworn as a witness on his own behalf.

On his cross-examination he was asked whether he had been convicted of assault and battery.

Also, whether he had pleaded guilty to a charge of atrocious assault and battery.

And, also,, whether he had pleaded non vult to a charge of petit larceny.

*602To each of these questions he answered yes, under objection to their competency.

The only question involved in the ease is whether it was error to require the.defendant to answer these interrogatories.

Our statute of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LockwoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  2. United States v. GibertU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1834
  3. People v. GoldsteinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  4. People v. AdamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Quintard v. KnoedlerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1885

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. State v. RamseurSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  2. Pfotzer v. Aqua System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  3. Murray v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  4. State v. FoxNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  5. Peel v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API