State v. Henson
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On error to the Mercer Oyer and Terminer.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court' was delivered by
Van Syckel, J.
The defendant, on his trial for homicide, was sworn as a witness on his own behalf.
On his cross-examination he was asked whether he had been convicted of assault and battery.
Also, whether he had pleaded guilty to a charge of atrocious assault and battery.
And, also,, whether he had pleaded non vult to a charge of petit larceny.
*602To each of these questions he answered yes, under objection to their competency.
The only question involved in the ease is whether it was error to require the.defendant to answer these interrogatories.
Our statute of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LockwoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
- United States v. GibertU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1834
- People v. GoldsteinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- People v. AdamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Quintard v. KnoedlerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1885
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- State v. RamseurSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- Pfotzer v. Aqua System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
- Murray v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- State v. FoxNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Peel v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.