Bonnell v. McLaughlin
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
Plaintiffs, as devisees under the will of James McMahon, deceased, brought this action against the defendants to recover property, title to which vested in Thomas McLaughlin and Anna McLaughlin, his wife, under deed to them by James McMahon, plaintiffs’ testate. They charge a forfeiture of the title in the McLaughlins for their breach of a condition subsequent contained in McMahon’s deed to them. The other defendants are grantees of the McLaughlins of certain parts of the land conveyed in the McMahon deed. The complaint set up the McMahon conveyance in full, and the court sustained a general…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Murray v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Wakefield v. VanTassellIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
- Hardy Bros. v. GallowaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
- Maynard v. PolhemusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Pritchard v. . BaileySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Coast Bank v. MinderhoutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Title Guarantee & Trust Co. v. GarrottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Wharton v. MollinetCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Godoy v. LinznerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
- Lawatch v. LawatchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962