Legal Opinion

In Re Prantil

California Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1989No. S006817PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT. *

This is a proceeding to review the recommendation of the Review Department of the State Bar Court that petitioner Frank G. Prantil be disbarred. The review department adopted unanimously the findings and conclusions of the hearing panel, which recommended disbarment following petitioner’s conviction of forgery by uttering. (Pen. Code, § 470.)

Petitioner seeks to collaterally attack the validity of his forgery conviction by reasserting due process claims previously raised in the criminal proceedings, rejected in the Court of Appeal and denied review by this court. As…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In Re HallinanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Frank George Prantil v. State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  3. In Re BogartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. In Re CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  5. In Re FordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rose v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  2. In Re PaguiriganCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against SmithWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  4. In Re GossageCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  5. In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against SmithWashington Supreme Court · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API