Legal Opinion

Spectrum Glass Co. v. Public Utility District No. 1

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 5, 2005No. 54460-8-IPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 Spectrum Glass Company (Spectrum) contends the trial court erred in dismissing its breach of contract and promissory estoppel claims against Sno-homish County Public Utility District No. 1 (the PUD) on summary judgment. Spectrum claims there are material issues of fact regarding whether the rate contained in its Bridge Contract with the PUD was subject to change and whether the PUD promised Spectrum a fixed rate. We conclude the only reasonable inference from the extrinsic evidence is that the rate in the Bridge Contract was subject to change. Because the applicable rate was set by…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Berg v. HudesmanWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Hollis v. Garwall, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Smith v. Safeco Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Smith v. Safeco InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2003

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Washington State Republican Party v. Washington State GrangeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. Bryan Kelley And Dorre Don Llc v. Beverly L. TondaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  3. Microsoft Corp. v. Motorola, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2012
  4. Pitell v. King Cnty. Pub. Hosp. Dist. No. 2Court of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  5. United States ex rel. TBH & Associates, LLC v. Wilson Construction Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 2013

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API