Legal Opinion

Washington State Republican Party v. Washington State Grange

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 19, 2012No. 11-35122, 11-35124, 11-35125PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FISHER, Circuit Judge:

We address whether the State of Washington has designed its election ballots in a manner that eliminates the risk of widespread voter confusion, a question left unresolved in Washington State Grange v. Washington State Republican Party (“Grange ”), 552 U.S. 442, 128 S.Ct. 1184, 170 L.Ed.2d 151 (2008). We hold that the state has done so. The ballots, and related informational materials, inform voters that, although each candidate for partisan office may specify a political party that he or she prefers, a candidate’s preference does not imply that the candidate is…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Anderson v. CelebrezzeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Williams v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Doe I v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Burdick v. TakushiSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Arizona Libertarian Party v. ReaganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  2. Convolve, Inc. v. Compaq Computer Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
  3. Libertarian Nat'l Comm., Inc. v. Michael SalibaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024
  4. Microsoft Corp. v. Motorola, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2012
  5. Utah Republican Party v. HerbertDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2015

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API