Legal Opinion
Lunn & Sweet Co. v. Wolfman
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided June 28, 1926PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSanderson, J.
These are two actions of contract: one (with a declaration in eleven counts) for the price of shoes delivered under a written contract, with the eleventh count upon an account annexed for shoes delivered on the same dates and for the same amounts as those referred to in the preceding counts; and the other for loss sustained from the defendants’ failure to take other shoes under the same contract. In all counts, except the one on the account annexed, the plaintiff alleged that it entered into the contract, by mistake, in the name of Limn and Sweet Shoe Company. The answers set up a general…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Boston Ice Co. v. PotterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
- Brighton Packing Co. v. Butchers' Slaughtering & Melting Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Kaufmann v. SydemanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
- New England Cabinet Works v. MorrisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Clement v. British American Assurance Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Stern v. LiebermanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Lunn & Sweet Co. v. WolfmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Interstate Litho Corp. v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Souza v. BeckerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Comstock v. SouleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.