Carson v. . Jenkins
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
It is not perceived upon what theory the plaintiff is entitled to eject the defendants from the land in question or to recover damages. He shows no present title, legal or equitable, in himself or in the North Wilkesboro' Academical and Industrial Institute, which is not a party. At most, he alleges that many years ago the said institute owned the locus in quo, and, when in active existence, certain courses were there taught Negro youths, which he is now desirous of pursuing. Upon these allegations, he demands possession of the land and damages for its detention.
It is elementary that, in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mobley v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
- Pope v. . PopeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
- Rumbough v. Sackett.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Hayes v. Sells CottonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Savage Bros. Timber Co. v. CozadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
3Cited by4 opinions
- Keen v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Keen v. . ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Davis v. Federal Land BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Boone v. PritchettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966