Legal Opinion

Friedman v. Roman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 22, 2009PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, in which the defendant counterclaimed for a declaration that the parties’ marital agreement was invalid and unenforceable, the plaintiff ap*1188peals from so much of an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cohen, J.), dated December 31, 2007, as denied her motion, in effect, for summary judgment declaring that the parties’ marital agreement is valid and enforceable, granted that branch of the defendant’s cross motion which was for summary judgment declaring that the marital agreement is invalid and unenforceable, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Welsbach Elec v. Mastec N. AmNew York Court of Appeals · 2006

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Frankel v. Citicorp Insurance Services, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. Velma J. Hussemann, by Her Next Friend and Attorney-In-Fact Marcella D. Ritter v. Herbert J. Hussemann Jr. And Robert J. Hussemann, as Trustees of the Herbert J. Hussemann Inter Vivos Trust Agreement, Dated June 3, 1991Supreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  3. Lupien v. LupienAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  4. Suwei Chuang v. Ya Chen HsiehAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  5. Velma J. Hussemann, by Her Next Friend and Attorney-In-Fact Marcella D. Ritter v. Herbert J. Hussemann Jr. and Robert J. Hussemann, as Trustees of the Herbert J. Hussemann Inter Vivos Trust Agreement, Dated June 3, 1991Supreme Court of Iowa · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API