Legal Opinion
Lupien v. Lupien
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 30, 2009PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1808Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied plaintiffs motion in this divorce action seeking an order determining that the parties’ premarital agreement is not valid and enforceable as an opting out agreement pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 236 (B) (3). The premarital agreement, which was signed by the parties in Massachusetts at a time when both parties resided there, contains a choice of law clause providing that “[t]he validity and construction of this Agreement shall be determined in accordance with the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.” It is well settled that courts will…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bloomfield v. BloomfieldNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- Welsbach Elec v. Mastec N. AmNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- Van Kipnis v. Van KipnisNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
- Friedman v. RomanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Lederman v. LedermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Great American InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Grund v. Delaware Charter Guarantee & Trust Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Sidney Frank Importing Co. v. Beam Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Burns v. Delaware Charter Guarantee & Trust Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Velma J. Hussemann, by Her Next Friend and Attorney-In-Fact Marcella D. Ritter v. Herbert J. Hussemann Jr. And Robert J. Hussemann, as Trustees of the Herbert J. Hussemann Inter Vivos Trust Agreement, Dated June 3, 1991Supreme Court of Iowa · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.