State of Oregon v. Cerruti
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Condemnation proceeding by the State, by and through its State Highway Commission, composed of T.H. Banfield and others, against M.A. Cerruti and Rose M. Cerruti, husband and wife, and others, to acquire agricultural lands owned by defendants.
The Circuit Court of Multnomah County, Frank C. Howell, pro tem., assessed defendants' damages, and the State appealed.
The Supreme Court, Lusk, C.J., held that testimony relating to profits derived from adjacent lands, and from speculative profits to be derived from defendant's lands had no bearing on question of market value, and were not admissible.
JUDG…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- San Diego Land & Town Co. v. NealeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Wassenich v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
- City & County of Denver v. QuickSupreme Court of Colorado · 1941
- Central Georgia Power Co. v. StoneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- Reisert v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.