Brocker Manufacturing & Supply Co. v. Mashburn
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.
This appeal involves an interpretation of Md. Ann. Code Art. 101, § 58. It is concerned with the question of whether vel non an employee, after an award by the Workmen’s Compensation Commission, may recover from a third party tortfeasor and continue to derive some benefits under the Workmen’s Compensation Act.
The factual situation out of which this case arose is undisputed. On April 11, 1970, William Maddox Mash-burn, then age 30, was seriously and permanently injured as the result of an automobile collision occurring on the northern approach to the Baltimore Harbor Tunnel. At that time, a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1908
- Baltimore Transit Co. v. State Rx Rel. SchrieferCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
- Clough & Molloy, Inc. v. ShillingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
- Subsequent Injury Fund v. ChapmanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1971
- Subsequent Injury Fund v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Page v. HibbardIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
- Franch v. AnkneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Great Coastal Express, Inc. v. SchrueferCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Hunley v. Silver Furniture Mfg. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2001
- Hastings v. MechalskeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.